Home The Diagnostic The Blueprint The Category Control The Problem FAQ PressAbout
EN NL DE FR ES
Start the conversation

The enemy is not a competitor.
It is a frame you did not set.

Execution is not the first problem. The frame is.

If buyers place you in the wrong category, every deal starts from the wrong comparison.

That is why more activity often makes the problem worse.

The default response is to execute harder. Hire better salespeople. Sharpen the deck. Tighten the funnel.

The belief is that effort, eventually, changes what the market sees.

It does not.

The moment a deal opens, the buyer is already using someone else's frame to evaluate you.

You are not late to the meeting. You are late to the category.

No amount of execution changes the frame you are being measured against.

Companies do not fail because they solve problems badly.

They fail because they committed to a problem someone else defined.

Once the problem is set, the category is set. Once the category is set, the economics are set.

And it does not feel like failure. It feels like friction.

Deals take longer. Comparisons feel wrong. Messaging does not land the way it should.

That is category drift - the market placing you in the wrong box.

It shows up in multiples 12 to 18 months later, not in this quarter's pipeline.

The rules are already being set. And you are still operating inside them.

Why execution fails when the market frame is wrong.

Watch the video: Play video

What Category Design actually changes

Category leaders capture 76% of market value

Not market share. Total market value. The majority goes to the company the market uses as the reference point.

Once a competitor defines the rules, every deal starts in their favour

You are measured against their standard. No amount of execution changes that by itself.

The market does not wait

The companies that name the problem first set the rules. The window closes before many realise it has opened.

Wrong decisions compound invisibly

They do not look catastrophic immediately. The cost appears 12-18 months later - in capital burned, position lost, and strategic momentum stalled.

How Venturoxx works

I get involved when category,
capital, or position is at risk.

Not execution support. Not a running retainer. Not another layer of advice. A targeted intervention at the moment the next 18 months get decided.

Where you are determines what changes

The misalignment costs more than the fix. Usually significantly more.

Three interventions. Not sequential. Not interchangeable.

Each intervention is complete. The right starting point depends on what is actually at risk. Some companies need clarity, some need a new market position, and some need ongoing category control while strategic decisions are already moving.

01 - DIAGNOSTIC

The Diagnostic

€12,000 - €20,000 fixed fee

Find the real problem. Not the symptom.

Used when the company feels friction, but the real constraint is still hidden.

The signals are there. Pipeline stalls, wrong comparisons, unclear positioning. See how it works.

Start with The Diagnostic
  • Fixed fee.
  • ~2 weeks.
  • One clear answer.

Pricing is defined upfront. The service page explains the work; the FAQ explains the pricing logic.

02 - BLUEPRINT

The Blueprint

€40,000 - €75,000 milestone-based

Replace what the market thinks you are.

Used when the market sees the company through the wrong category frame.

The market has you in the wrong frame. See how it works.

Start with The Blueprint
  • Milestone-based.
  • ~6-8 weeks.
  • One clear position the market cannot ignore.

Pricing is defined upfront. The service page explains the work; the FAQ explains the pricing logic.

03 - CATEGORY CONTROL

The Category Control

€10,000 - €15,000 per month, minimum six months

Stop the company from drifting back.

Used when strategic decisions are already shaping valuation, position, and timing.

Things are moving. The frame is not holding. See how it works.

Start with The Category Control
  • Monthly engagement.
  • Minimum six months.
  • Ongoing decision control.

Pricing is defined upfront. The service page explains the work; the FAQ explains the pricing logic.

Bounded engagement. Clear decision point. No open-ended advisory by default.

In. Fix. Out.

Richard Poolman

The problem is never what it appears to be.

Strong teams. Real traction. Serious capital. And still, something does not compound. Because the frame is wrong, and no one has forced the decision to change it.

Execution is not the constraint. Direction is.

Frame Name Claim

Define the problem. Name the category. Claim the position.

This is when you call me

01

Your valuation story is already being written

By the market, not by you. Every funding conversation, board meeting and enterprise deal reflects it. Investors are not only buying revenue. They are buying the market you can own. If that frame is weak, the multiple pays the price.

02

You scaled the team, but not the clarity

More sales, marketing and leadership capacity now creates more versions of the story. That is not a people problem. It is a frame problem.

03

The product has proof, but the market assigns the wrong value

Customers see it. The market still compares it to the wrong alternatives. That gap costs pricing power, deal speed and category leverage.

If you do not define the category, the market will.

And once it does, you are measured against it. Not the other way around.

COMMON QUESTIONS

Where category starts to change outcomes, capital, and valuation

Why you? What gives you the standing to make this call?
I have spent three decades inside the companies where this problem has determined outcomes. ServiceNow, Snowflake, Tanium, Mercury Interactive (acquired by HP) - scaling revenue, building GTM systems, and watching category positioning determine which deals close and which ones stall. I have completed the Category Design Academy and the Creator Capitalist program. I have worked directly with Christopher Lochhead and Eddie Yoon, the founders of Category Design, and contributed to their latest book, Creator Capitalist (2026). During my years at ServiceNow and Snowflake, I worked directly with Frank Slootman at key moments - then CEO at ServiceNow and later CEO at Snowflake - and saw his operating discipline up close: simplify the direction, raise the standard, hold position under pressure, and keep execution tied to strategy. Venturoxx is personally delivered by Richard Poolman. No junior consulting layer. No handover. No large team learning the problem at the client's expense. Read more on the About page.
Why does category matter more than execution?
The market decides what you are before it evaluates what you do. That decision determines your comparison set, which budgets open, how deals move, and how pricing power develops. It shapes the multiple - the ratio investors use to value a company relative to its revenue - and the narrative that governs exit. Strong execution inside the wrong category frame does not fix the frame - it accelerates spend toward the wrong outcome. Direction matters more than speed.
Isn't this a CMO, marketing or messaging problem?
No. Marketing explains the company inside a frame. The Problem decides whether that frame is right in the first place. That is why this cannot be delegated as a campaign, brand or messaging project. It affects what the company claims, how buyers compare it, which budgets open, and how investors evaluate it. The CMO should be involved. But the CEO, founder or board must own the decision. If the frame is wrong, better messaging only makes the wrong story clearer.
What actually goes wrong when category is off?
The market has already placed you before you enter the room. That placement determines who you are compared to, which budgets open, and how deals move. When that placement is wrong, everything works harder than it should. The patterns are recognisable: deals stall without a clear reason, the team explains the company differently in every room, pricing pressure increases without the product changing, and investors ask questions that should be straightforward. It is usually diagnosed as an execution problem: more pipeline, better messaging, a new sales leader. The fixes do not work because the problem sits upstream. Execution does not resolve a broken frame. It accelerates it.
Growth is happening. Why would we touch this now?
If growth is compounding, pricing power is increasing, and the comparison set feels right, this is not urgent. But growth can hide category drift. Activity can rise while deals take longer, conversion stalls, pricing weakens and revenue growth fails to match the effort. Those are early signals that the market is placing the company in the wrong frame. Category issues are cheaper to fix before they show up in missed targets, lower confidence or weaker valuation - usually 12 to 18 months later.
We already have a strategy. Does this replace it?
No. Strategy works on assumptions about how the market sees you. If those assumptions are wrong, the strategy is sound logic applied in the wrong direction. This does not replace strategy. It tests whether the image the market has of you matches the one your strategy is built on.
Who owns the decision, and where does the budget come from?
The CEO, founder, board or lead investor must own the decision. Marketing, sales and product should contribute input, but this is not financed like a campaign. It belongs next to capital allocation, strategic growth and executive decision-making. The consequence is not marketing performance. It is market position, pricing power, deal quality, investor confidence and future optionality. In practice, it is funded from a strategic, operational or executive budget - not from campaign spend.
Does category affect valuation and exit?
Directly. Companies that own their category are valued differently than companies that follow. Investors and acquirers always compare - and who you are compared to is a category decision. Same revenue. Same team. Different category. Different outcome. Valuation does not start with the numbers. It starts with the image the market has of you. That image determines the multiple. And the multiple determines the exit.
Where do we start?
Three engagement levels, not sequential.

01 The Diagnostic: Find the real problem, not the symptom. ~2 weeks, one clear answer.
02 The Blueprint: Replace the wrong position. Redesign the GTM system. ~6-8 weeks, milestone-based.
03 The Category Control: Strategic control at leadership level, applied in real decisions and market positioning. Minimum six months.

If the problem is still unclear, start with the The Diagnostic. If the direction is clear but the system is not, start with the The Blueprint. If decisions are already being made and the stakes are high, start with The Category Control.
We have tried to define our position before. Why would this hold?
Because this forces the decision that usually gets avoided. The company must decide which problem it owns, which market frame it rejects, which category it wants to define, and what it will stop saying yes to. Positioning does not hold when it stays as copy. It holds when leadership turns it into decisions, trade-offs and operating logic.
What does it cost, and how is the engagement protected?

It should be evaluated against the cost of staying in the wrong frame. When category is wrong, the cost compounds: deals slow down, pricing compresses, capital is consumed without changing position, and strategic options narrow.

The The Diagnostic runs between €12,000 and €20,000. Fixed. Two weeks. One clear answer. The The Blueprint runs between €40,000 and €75,000, milestone-based over ~6-8 weeks, depending on complexity. The Category Control is €10,000 to €15,000 per month, typically over a minimum of six months.

No day rates. No open-ended scope. No hidden costs. No extension without reason. The output is not a long recommendation deck that creates more work. The output is a clear decision, a usable frame, concrete recommendations and the operating logic needed to act on them immediately.

If there is no realistic path to a clear outcome, the engagement does not start. If the problem is not a real category, positioning or GTM constraint, I will say so. Where follow-up guidance is needed, it exists to prevent drift and protect the position - not to create dependency. In. Fix. Out.

If this feels familiar, you are likely closer to the real issue. That is when the conversation becomes worth having.

Start the conversation